Anna Daniels
Over time, film criticism has undergone a significant transformation, moving away from its once-respected position characterized by insightful discussions and profound historical knowledge. Viggo Mortensen, known for his roles in iconic films like “The Lord of the Rings” and his directing work, has expressed his worries regarding the current state of film criticism. He believes that many contemporary critics lack a solid grasp of film history and the intricacies of the filmmaking process. Mortensen criticizes the quality of critical thinking in reviews today, emphasizing the growing gap between modern critics and the extensive history of cinema.
Mortensen’s concerns are echoed by noted film historian Jonathan Rosenbaum, who has criticized present-day reviewers as “quote whores” for often providing favorable taglines to studios. Rosenbaum highlights a concerning relationship between critics and studios, where genuine critique is overshadowed by promotional activities.
The rise of social media has blurred the boundaries between professional critics, influencers, and bloggers, leading to a blending of expertise. Mortensen notes that many critics today have not even watched influential films like “Vertigo” or “Citizen Kane.”
Quentin Tarantino, another figure in the film industry, shares Mortensen’s concerns. He suggests that contemporary film criticism lacks a distinct identity and coherence. Tarantino reminisces about a time when he could easily identify a critic’s unique style and taste, a connection he now finds lacking. He highlights the impact of aggregate review platforms like Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic on diminishing individual critique and making it challenging for distinctive voices to shine through.
While Roger Ebert once hailed the internet age as a “golden age for film criticism” due to the surge in critics, the quality and depth of analysis have not matched this growth. The result is a diluted field where the profound historical and technical understanding that characterized esteemed film criticism is becoming scarcer.
As the realm of film criticism continues to evolve, the balancing act persists between democratizing voices and upholding informed, perceptive analysis. For Mortensen and Tarantino, the essence of film criticism’s future lies in rediscovering the deep historical reverence for cinema that was once its defining feature.
Share your thoughts on the current state of film criticism. Do you align with Viggo Mortensen and Quentin Tarantino in believing it lacks historical depth and individuality, or do you appreciate the new perspectives brought about by the digital age?
