in , ,

Kim Kardashian Faces Backlash Over Water Usage Amid LA Wildfires

Kim Kardashian is getting criticised for wasting water in the midst of the Los Angeles wildfires

The wildfires in Southern California are still causing havoc, particularly in Los Angeles, where the situation remains critical just ahead of 2025. Over 153,000 individuals have been evacuated for their safety. The county has declared a public health emergency due to the dangers posed by smoke and particulates in the air.

Adding to the controversy, Kim Kardashian has faced backlash for neglecting water conservation regulations during this critical time. While water is vital for aiding firefighters, her actions have sparked criticism for excessive use.

<div class="ue-c-article__media-caption-inner"><span class="ue-c-article__media-description">Kim Kardashian with Tesla&#8217;s new robot</span></div>

This isn’t the first time Kim has been in hot water regarding water use; back in 2022, she used 232,000 gallons to maintain her garden, despite strict conservation laws, resulting in fines from authorities, as reported by Radar Online.

Other Celebrities Under Fire

In the same year, Kevin Hart, Sylvester Stallone, and Dwyane Wade also faced criticism.

Online users lambasted them for their excessive watering habits:

“This group believes they can simply pay their way through serious issues. They need proper warnings followed by usage cuts to make them take this seriously.”

“Water regulators will be introduced to enforce limits for non-compliance. It’s only $100 for the big fine.”

“Celebrities contribute significantly to environmental harm, wasting water and utilizing private jets as though they are standard vehicles, leading to food waste and extravagant parties.”

These remarks were prevalent on social media.

Controversy Over Private Firefighters

Hollywood celebrities continue to stir up controversies; one notable issue is their choice to hire private firefighters, with many accusing them of selfishness amid a community crisis.

Sources reveal that this service can cost approximately $2000 per hour for protecting homes and properties.

Demand for these services is reportedly soaring; according to Chris Dunn, a private station leader, “My phone isn’t stopping. Demand has never been higher.”

One individual defended their choice to hire such services in a media interview while remaining anonymous, stating, “This week has proven you can’t rely on the city for property protection. I can afford it, so why not?”

While individuals are entitled to use their resources as they see fit, the careless use of water during this time requires significant attention, particularly for the residents of Los Angeles.

Report

Check This:  Actors Who Came Out After Portraying an LGBTQ+ Character

What do you think?

184 Points
Upvote Downvote

Leave a Reply

Avatar

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *