The Rising Resentment Towards Emilia Perez at the Oscars

Jacques Audiard’s film Emilia Perez has sparked significant controversy. This divisive trans musical has generated heated discussions, earning both strong criticism and admiration. Despite facing backlash, it has impressively received 13 Oscar nominations, including for Best Picture. How does a film evoke such mixed emotions yet achieve such acclaim? Exploring the criticism alongside the praise for Emilia Perez reveals the complexity of its reception.

Criticism: Loud, Widespread, and Relentless
The negativity surrounding Emilia Perez echoes past Oscar debates, like those surrounding Green Book and Crash, which were faulted for their messages but still recognized by the Academy. Critics argue that Emilia Perez reinforces stereotypes and fails to enhance genuine representation. Pieces such as The Guardian’s “Oscars groupthink pushes Emilia Perez” and Slate’s provocatively titled “Emilia Perez Is Not a Good Movie” summarize the prevailing sentiment online.

Many Mexican viewers have been particularly critical, claiming the film caricatures their culture, while LGBTQ+ advocates argue it regresses trans representation. Social media has amplified discontent, with viral criticisms labeling it “one of the worst nominated films.” In response to the backlash, Audiard issued a tepid apology, recognizing cultural insensitivity but standing by his artistic vision.

The Admiration in Hollywood
Conversely, the film is receiving accolades from Hollywood’s prestigious figures, including James Cameron and Madonna. The announcement of 13 nominations reflects the industry’s fondness for Emilia Perez. But why this admiration?

A key reason is its daring approach. Audiard boldly presents a musical led by a trans actress, marking progress in some aspects, as it features the first openly trans performer nominated for an Oscar. Though the film may have its flaws, its ambition and innovation often resonate with Academy voters.

Additionally, its technical merit—such as rich cinematography, creative musical sequences, and a powerful lead performance—makes it hard to overlook. Many in Hollywood seem to regard Emilia Perez as not merely a movie but as a statement advocating creativity in a landscape increasingly filled with formulaic narratives.

The Gap Between Online Opinions and Reality
Stepping outside the social media bubble reveals a different story. Many viewers express admiration for the film’s vibrancy and emotional depth. For every critical article, there are voices championing Emilia Perez as a misunderstood triumph.

This contrast illustrates a wider cultural trend: the internet can amplify negativity, while the general populace—and Hollywood—may hold a diverse perspective. The Oscars often reflect this latter view.

Personal Thoughts: As a fan of bold storytelling, I find Emilia Perez to be more intriguing than its critics suggest. Although the film sometimes stumbles in terms of representation, its ambition and audacity deserve recognition. The musical performances are captivating, and the lead is commendable, despite a weaker script. While I didn’t personally enjoy the film entirely—it has its messiness and occasional insensitivities—I appreciate its ambition to push boundaries. In a cinematic environment dominated by conventional choices, Emilia Perez takes risks, and that boldness should be acknowledged.

What are your thoughts? Does Emilia Perez warrant its Oscar recognition despite the backlash, or is the criticism fair? Share your opinions below!