Anna Daniels
In the complex realm of Oscar forecasts, shifts in the race can be as surprising as unexpected plot developments in a film by Brady Corbet. The anticipated frontrunner, “Anora,” has been dethroned by “The Brutalist,” introducing an intriguing dynamic in the Best Picture competition. But does this lengthy and ambitious film have what it takes to win over Academy voters?
The Ascension of ‘The Brutalist’: Directed by Brady Corbet, “The Brutalist” has gained critical praise and recently taken the lead in Gold Derby’s consensus lists. With a runtime of 215 minutes, it offers both challenges and opportunities in the Oscars landscape. Films of such duration have rarely bagged the Best Picture award, with “Lawrence of Arabia” being one prominent exception. This brings up the question: Can “The Brutalist” maintain voter interest with its extensive narrative and emotional resonance?
Theme and Execution: This film presents an immigrant narrative, chronicling the odyssey of a Hungarian architect navigating post-war America. The first half has been particularly praised for its storytelling, while opinions are mixed on the latter half. Corbet explores themes of identity, dreams, and ambition, delivering visually impressive sequences reminiscent of classic Hollywood while forging a contemporary identity.
Performance and Direction: Adrien Brody’s portrayal is being touted as a strong contender for Best Actor, reflecting his previous Oscar-winning performance. He balances vulnerability and determination, becoming a pivotal character within the expansive narrative. Should Corbet receive the Best Director award, it would highlight his ability to create a film that feels simultaneously grand and personal.
The Competitive Field: Even with “The Brutalist” at the forefront, the competition remains fierce with films like “Anora,” “Conclave,” and “Emilia Perez.” Each contender distinctively contributes to the mix—“Anora” with its blend of dark humor and social critique, “Conclave” offering political drama, and “Emilia Perez” showcasing vibrant musical storytelling. This variety hints at an unpredictable Oscar night, where voter preferences may be widely distributed.
Contextual Analysis: The Oscars often mirror larger societal discussions, and this year, films such as “The Brutalist” may resonate for their navigation of themes around displacement and resilience. However, the film’s extended run could be a disadvantage unless it captures audiences with a compelling, necessary narrative throughout its duration.
Final Thoughts: As Oscar voting approaches, “The Brutalist” embodies high cinematic ambition, yet its chances for victory remain uncertain. If it secures the award, it would celebrate the unmatched power of storytelling, regardless of length. Conversely, whether it wins or not, the film’s impact marks it as a culturally significant work of this era.
My Personal Reflection: After viewing “The Brutalist,” I was moved by its emotional depth that fluctuates between loss and creative triumph. Brody delivers a remarkable performance that thoughtfully engages with themes of identity and legacy. While the film’s duration can be intimidating, its high moments provide a rewarding cinematic journey. However, the pacing in the latter half may alienate some audiences, potentially influencing its Oscar chances.
What are your thoughts on whether the length of a film should affect its shot at winning Best Picture, or should the quality of the story be the determining factor?
