Rita Odafe
This week, the legal dispute between Chief Afe Babalola and activist-attorney Dele Farotimi has been a major topic, causing concern among Nigerians, particularly those in the legal field. The potential outcomes of this case raise alarm about the state of the Nigerian judiciary.
Discussions have highlighted the deep-rooted corruption within Nigeria’s judicial system.
Lawyer Fred Nzeakor expressed that while corruption exists, it’s an overgeneralization to label the entire judiciary as corrupt. He pointed out that while some judges may engage in corrupt acts, many lawyers are also complicit because it is often a partnership in wrongdoing. He emphasized that it is crucial for the National Judicial Council to remain vigilant.
In an interview on Arise TV, Nzeakor discussed the ongoing case between Babalola and Farotimi. He noted the divide in public opinion surrounding the case, with conservatives feeling protective of Babalola’s long legal career, while radicals seek systemic change in Nigeria. He metaphorically likened the situation to a “tsetse fly on the scrotum,” suggesting it’s a no-win scenario that will ultimately harm Nigeria.
The overall perception of the country is concerning, according to Nzeakor, who cited former British Prime Minister David Cameron’s remarks about Nigeria’s corruption. He questioned when Nigeria would begin addressing its corruption issues.
Nzeakor underscored the significance of perception in both local and international contexts, stating that the ongoing visibility of corruption, especially at high levels, could deter investors. He stressed the necessity of a trustworthy judiciary for resolving business disputes, reiterating that without a reliable judicial system, investors will be reluctant to engage with Nigeria.
He criticized the treatment of Farotimi by the police, asserting that instead of arresting him, they should have issued an invitation first. Furthermore, he argued that the ongoing bail discussions are inappropriate, insisting that an accused person’s guilt cannot be predetermined without a proper hearing.
Nzeakor speculated that had Babalola taken more time to handle the matter, it might not have escalated. He suggested that pursuing civil action rather than involving the police could have kept the issue out of the public eye.
He highlighted the existing public anger stemming from police brutality and protests, which still resonates across Nigeria. The current atmosphere fosters a struggle between conservative and radical factions, with conservatives aiming to uphold the status quo and radicals demanding reform.
According to Nzeakor, Nigeria’s overwhelming population could be a source of strength if the nation could overcome its corruption challenges. He concluded by implying that the situation may necessitate mediation, such as that attempted by Mr. Peter Obi, to ease tensions among the parties involved.
