Brian Jeffrey
The Central Inspection Commission has formally reprimanded Nguyen Thi Kim Chi, the Deputy Minister of Education and Training, while suggesting disciplinary measures for several other high-ranking officials from various sectors and regions.
During its 56th meeting today, the Central Inspection Commission was led by Nguyen Duy Ngoc, a member of the Politburo and Secretary of the Party Central Committee.
After examining reports related to disciplinary suggestions for Party members who breached regulations across different institutions—including the Ministry of Education and Training, the Vietnam Rubber Group, as well as the provinces of Dong Nai and Hau Giang—the Commission decided to issue a warning to Nguyen Thi Kim Chi, who is also a member of the Standing Board of the Party Committee at the Ministry of Education and Training.
The Commission indicated that Nguyen Thi Kim Chi, in her role as a member of the Nghe An Provincial Party Committee and as Party Secretary of Cua Lo Town, had infringed upon Party rules and state legislation while executing her duties.
Her actions were found to violate the Party’s standards for conduct and did not align with the expectations of exemplary leadership. Such violations led to serious repercussions, damaging the Party’s credibility, which necessitated disciplinary measures.
The Central Inspection Commission advised that higher authorities should consider taking disciplinary actions against the following individuals:
Tran Ngoc Thuan, the former member of the Standing Board of the Party Committee of the Central Business Bloc, as well as the former Party Secretary and Chairman of the Board of the Vietnam Rubber Group.
Vo Van Chanh, the former member of the Dong Nai Provincial Party Standing Committee and the previous Vice Chairman of the Dong Nai Provincial People’s Committee.
Nguyen Van Tien, the former provincial Party member and past Vice Chairman of the Hau Giang Provincial People’s Council.
These officials exhibited a decline in political integrity, ethical standards, and personal conduct, violating Party regulations and state laws while executing their responsibilities, and failing to effectively combat corruption and misconduct.
Their actions breached the prohibitive rules for Party members and did not demonstrate the required exemplary behavior, resulting in grave consequences that significantly harmed the trust in the Party organizations, local governments, and related agencies.
In addition, the Commission discussed and assessed a draft procedural framework aimed at guidelines for inspections and oversight by Party advisory and support entities. They also deliberated on five disciplinary appeals and wrapped up discussions on several key topics.
